The doctrine today
The current policy for whole blood, components, fractions and a patient’s own blood, with the earlier rule shown for comparison. As of .
In the Society’s own words
“Jehovah's Witnesses do not accept transfusions of whole blood, nor do we donate blood that would be used as a whole blood transfusion to another person.”
“Christians are not under the Mosaic Law. However, we obey the apostolic command to “abstain from blood.” Furthermore, the Bible does not comment on the use of a person's own blood in medical and surgical care. Therefore, like other choices about health care, each Christian must make his own decision about the use of his own blood in all medical and surgical care.”
“…the Governing Body has decided that this same principle applies to the four primary components of whole blood—red cells, white cells, plasma, and platelets—that are derived from another person's blood. Therefore, each Christian must make his own personal decision about the use of these four primary components in all medical and surgical care. Likewise, each Christian must decide whether to donate blood for the clearly expressed purpose of providing components or fractions for use by another person.”
“After considering these and other factors, each Christian must decide whether or not he will accept a component or fraction derived from another person's blood. The congregation will not get involved in that decision, and individual Christians should not judge others.”
“If the elders learn that a Christian has consumed unbled meat or blood, or accepted a transfusion of whole blood of another person (allogeneic), two elders should meet with him to provide loving shepherding and to establish the facts. … Depending on the circumstances, the individual may not be exemplary for a period of time.”
Product by product
Whole blood from another person
RefusedAllogeneic whole-blood transfusion
- Since
- Before that
- Not addressed as a medical question; the passages now cited were read as dietary rules.
- Wording
- “Jehovah's Witnesses do not accept transfusions of whole blood…”“Questions From Readers”, jw.org, 18 September 2026
- Check
The four primary components from another person
Personal decisionRed cells, white cells, platelets, plasma
- Since
- Before that
- Refused. “Accepting whole blood or any of those four primary components violates God's law” (The Watchtower, 15 June 2004).
- Wording
- “…each Christian must make his own personal decision about the use of these four primary components in all medical and surgical care.”“Questions From Readers”, jw.org, 18 September 2026
- Check
Fractions of any primary component
Personal decisionAlbumin, immunoglobulins, clotting factors VIII and IX, hemoglobin-based products, interferons, cryoprecipitate
- Since
- Before that
- Refused as a class, with individual products permitted piecemeal from 1961 (vaccines) onward. Albumin was at one point stated to “come under the Scriptural ban”.
- Wording
- “…when it comes to fractions of any of the primary components, each Christian, after careful and prayerful meditation, must conscientiously decide for himself.”The Watchtower, 15 June 2000, pages 29–31
- Check
- Questions From Readers: blood components and fractions
- Do Jehovah's Witnesses Accept Any Minor Fractions of Blood?
- Navigating blood refusal: a clinical guide to Jehovah's Witness patients and Watchtower policy
- The Watchtower's changing stance on blood transfusions
- New Watchtower blood transfusion policy
A patient's own blood, stored in advance
Personal decisionPre-operative autologous donation
- Since
- Before that
- Refused. The March 1989 article expressly rejected collecting and storing a patient’s blood for later transfusion.
- Wording
- “…the Bible does not comment on the use of a person's own blood in medical and surgical care.”2026 Governing Body Update #2, 20 March 2026
- Check
A patient’s own blood used during treatment
Personal decisionHemodilution, intra-operative cell salvage, heart-lung bypass, dialysis
- Since
- Before that
- By March 1989, some uses during surgery were already left to conscience, including hemodilution and cell salvage. The article expressly said uninterrupted flow was not the deciding issue. The March 2026 update broadened personal choice to all uses of a patient’s own blood.
- Wording
- “…Some Christians have permitted this if the equipment is not primed with stored blood.”The Watchtower, 1 March 1989, pages 30–31; 2026 Governing Body Update #2
- Check
Donating blood for components or fractions
Personal decisionGiving blood to a blood bank for processing
- Since
- Before that
- Refused. Donation was treated as complicity in transfusion.
- Wording
- “…each Christian must decide whether to donate blood for the clearly expressed purpose of providing components or fractions for use by another person.”“Questions From Readers”, jw.org, 18 September 2026
- Check
Donating blood for whole-blood transfusion
Refused- Since
- Before that
- Not addressed.
- Wording
- “…nor do we donate blood that would be used as a whole blood transfusion to another person.”“Questions From Readers”, jw.org, 18 September 2026
- Check
Organ and tissue transplants
Personal decisionKidney, heart, cornea, bone marrow
- Since
- Before that
- Refused from 1967 as a form of cannibalism.
- Citation
- The Watchtower, 15 March 1980, page 31 — effect documented by secondary sources; original not yet read
- Check
What happens to someone who accepts
- Whole blood
- The public policy still prohibits another person’s whole blood. A September 2026 internal announcement supplied to this site says elders should meet with a member who accepts it and that congregation responsibilities may be affected. The scan has not been independently authenticated. Earlier rules allowed expulsion for unrepentant acceptance; the quoted 2026 wording alone does not establish whether that sanction still applies.
- Components and fractions
- The public September article says the congregation will not intervene in decisions about components or fractions and members should not judge others. Its footnote says personal medical decisions usually need be discussed only with the health-care agents named on the member’s directive. Hospital Liaison Committee help is offered on request.
Sources: Announcement to congregations and to bodies of elders, 18 September 2026 (9/18/26-E), quoted from scans supplied to this site and not independently authenticated; The Watchtower, 15 January 1961, pages 63–64; Watch Tower press statement, 14 June 2000, as reported.
Commentary
This site’s assessment of the sources above.
The September change permits choices that the 2000 and 2004 articles expressly prohibited. It leaves a question for the organisation: why was accepting a component treated as breaking God’s law before this announcement?
The new policy gives members more choice. Its effects on congregation practice should be assessed against the new instructions, without assuming that the former penalties still apply to components.